just fyi

Jan. 13th, 2010 08:28 am
goddessfarmer: (Default)
[personal profile] goddessfarmer
Science in favor of non-GMO food.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/12/monsantos-gmo-corn-linked_n_420365.html

Date: 2010-01-13 02:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chocorua.livejournal.com
Reading a little closer, they're saying a) Monsanto's studies attempting to prove GMO corn is safe are pretty pathetic, and b) there are potential issues which really need further, better and truly independent study.

Date: 2010-01-13 07:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] koshmom.livejournal.com
... but how do you know that the study didn't feed the rats 800 times the amount of genetically engineered corn than they would normally eat, and no other foods for their entire lives? I never totally believe "studies" when the people performing the study have a desire to prove the product bad from the start.

Yes, it's a data point, but only one of many. Would you believe data points about Obama's health plan if the only data points you heard were from a study sponsored by the Republican National Committee? Especially if that data point was also confirmed by Fox TV News?

Date: 2010-01-13 07:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chocorua.livejournal.com
The paper referenced wasn't about new research, instead the group did a rigorous analysis of Monsanto's published research and data they released under court order.

Profile

goddessfarmer: (Default)
goddessfarmer

April 2018

S M T W T F S
123 4567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 26th, 2025 11:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios